and not to grow thin in the city,
where at some point you will have to live;
and one must imagine the absence of money.Most of all though: the living weight,the sound of his feet on the needles,and, since he is heavy, and real . . .
No, I think Meghan O’Rourke is very skillfully playing a rhetorical game. She gives us a whiff of the specifics that might concern a father, but from the first line, the poet has loaded the situation with overtones that are dark, difficult, pragmatic, economic, philosophical, psychoanalytic.
O’Rourke is having her cake and eating it too, playing at a childhood situation while driving at something adult and complex. So, by the time we get to the more obviously daunting questions, we’ve been prepared for them:
and, since he is heavy, and real,
. . . one must imagine lovein the mind that does not know love,
an animal mind, a love that does not dependon your image of it,your understanding of it;
I find those lines chilling, haunting, almost Gothic, the creation of a Frankenstein—or is it Hannibal Lector whose mind "does not know love?"
So what is this scary metaphor for or symbol of a horse? I suspect it’s poetry—or art in general. Once “invented,” art, like a half-pretend, half-material horse, is full of considerations that are, if I may quote myself, dark, difficult, pragmatic, economic, philosophical, psychoanalytic.
So what is this scary metaphor for or symbol of a horse? I suspect it’s poetry—or art in general. Once “invented,” art, like a half-pretend, half-material horse, is full of considerations that are, if I may quote myself, dark, difficult, pragmatic, economic, philosophical, psychoanalytic.
Like O’Rourke’s symbolic horse, a poem or painting is indifferent to the nutrients for a literal horse, because the work of art is an invention, not a palpable, hungry, breathing, and above all, not a loving presence. So it is:
indifferent to all that it lacks:
a muzzle and two black eyeslooking the day away, a field emptyof everything but witch grass, fluent trees,and some piles of hay.
Like the Mona Lisa of the 1950s song, this invented horse is just a cold and lonely, lovely piece of art. Yet I do not mean to diminish the scope or sophistication of the poem by comparing it to something in pop culture as well as a child's imagining. By offering this notion of a poem, Meghan O'Rourke is able to conjure all the romance, gallantry, nobility, and simply all the pleasure of a horse. In a modern culture where horses are not a primary or practical means of transportation or labor, all those characteristics amount to a child's enjoyment of riding; it’s a fanciful, pretend world. So O’Rourke tries to give us the weightier aspects of invention as well.
s She has taken an enormous chance here—the chance of sounding foolish. A poem as a child’s horse might even seem to degrade, or at least challenge, every traditional, loftier notion we have about the nature of artistic creation. But Meghan O’Rourke sees that the experience of writing is all that—a child’s infatuation, a romantic gambol, but also a gallop into awareness of darker matters. She makes every piece of the puzzle fit, and gives us a fresh consideration of creativity. It's an intriguing, provocative ride.
Inventing a Horse by Meghan O'Rourke : The Poetry Foundation
Inventing a Horse by Meghan O'Rourke : The Poetry Foundation
*
Oh, my dear, you sent this at the perfect time. It's not about horses, well it is about horses. And creativity. Like looking at a collection of clouds, and not seeing a picture in the clouds, but in the sky, and what the clouds frame.
ReplyDeleteArt, like a horse, can't be created by a committee. They might all end up with their own versions of a camel.
ReplyDeleteBut then the camels live on ...
Merry-go-round. Horses. Beautifully painted. Unlike the sweating steeds that pulled plows—two 14 inch bottom plows in straight rows. One horse in the furrow—pulling—the other on the unplowed ground that would turn 180º then they horses returned. Plowing.
ReplyDeletegirls and horses. Oh Altadenahiker !
ReplyDeleteI have so much to say about this poem that I would end up spoiling it. It's now officially one of my favorites. Thanks so much for this, Banjo Man!
ReplyDeleteAH and Ken, I'm pretty sure you've gone PG13, but I can't prove anything.
ReplyDeleteYou two and RuneE, you have your own metaphors going. Good deal.
Abe, I often wonder how people who really know a subject (farming or nature or animals) are responding to any writer's version. You might have your own poem going there. Very nice.
Paula, thanks. I'd love to hear you go on. I didn't applaud you enough last time you did, but at least PA did.
I chose this poem to recite for the contest known as poetry out loud and was struggling to find the meaning to this poem. Earlier I found it, it came out of nowhere (just know it wasn't as deep as your view, but we all see things differently). I think it is about the tiring amount of work involved with caring for a horse (I ride horses myself and understand this). But even with everything you have to do, you still go out and do it everyday. Because you love the horse, and no matter what has happened to the horse it is still capable of loving you back. If you're gentle and kind. It may not be the right view but I just thought I should share my view of the poem.
ReplyDelete