In the midst of our current political debacle, there's a tenuous pause in the government-shutdown danse macabre, but the best news is that most American citizens are finally getting
disgusted. As I look back at our 1960s Civil Rights movement and the protests about the American war in Vietnam, I’m still bewildered at how long it took the general
public to feel sickened by burning crosses and lynchings at home and body bags abroad, which is our home away from home.
I’m still not sure Main Street worries enough about racial injustice, or class warfare, or the irrational features
of every clergicalized religion, or the human fondness for war (while we make Christian or Buddhist noise about
abhorring war, turning cheeks, and judging not lest we be judged). But
every once in awhile Main Street just says No to mindless meanness, or it behaves
in an utterly compassionate way toward another human or animal, and I just
can’t quite give up on us. So, with continued embarrassment, I offer more words, words, words and ignore the fact that less is more.
Something in all the current
political idiocy made me think of Shelley’s seemingly apolitical sonnet, “Lift Not the Painted
Veil.”
Lift
not the painted veil which those who live
Call
Life: though unreal shapes be pictured there,
And
it but mimic all we would believe
With
colours idly spread,--behind, lurk Fear
And
Hope, twin Destinies; who ever weave
Their
shadows, o'er the chasm, sightless and drear.
I
knew one who had lifted it--he sought,
For
his lost heart was tender, things to love,
But
found them not, alas! nor was there aught
The
world contains, the which he could approve.
Through
the unheeding many he did move,
A
splendour among shadows, a bright blot
Upon
this gloomy scene, a Spirit that strove
For
truth, and like the Preacher found it not.
I’m
not wild about the poem except for its opening and closing two lines, which
I’ve remembered since college. Shelley seems to be distinguishing between the
material (matter-ial) world—the
painted veil—and something like a Platonic ideal or spiritual world behind and
beyond the veil.
As
human matter—atomic particles and whatnot—driven by appetite, we naturally care about alluring, sexy, tangible veils. (I've sometimes wondered what Shelley would think of Las Vegas). We don’t know what’s behind them, but the little philosopher or
theologian in us “would believe” there is something bigger, better, less
concrete and crass than gaudy physicality, with its “colours idly spread.” To be idly spread suggests randomness and
chaos, so the visual surface would be fetching but ultimately pointless.
Shelley’s
sparkly veil is what we call life; we’re satisfied with the surfaces of things.
Like crows drawn to shiny baubles, we like a casino on our river. We are drawn to painted masks—unless we are that other kind of seeker, wannabe mystics, oddballs hoping to find a larger truth beyond the appearances
of things, beyond matter, like Shelley’s “one who had lifted it” in his search
for “things to love.” That guy fails. That “one” ends up wandering in “this
gloomy scene” where there was nothing “which he could approve,” as he traveled
among the “unheeding many.” It's the thinkers who are likely to end up in this state--only briefly and from time to time, one hopes.
Sidebar
One: The title character of
Hawthorne’s short story, “Ethan Brand,” has a similar problem. He sets out to
find “the Unpardonable Sin” and in so doing, he commits the Unpardonable Sin,
which consists of setting himself above the masses, even though the masses are
a sorry crowd, drunk, disorderly and aggressively stupid. But the story seems
to say those are our choices: be a
seeker, which causes the heart to turn to stone, or humbly accept our lot as just one more among the miserable, mindless many.
Sidebar
Two: Although Shelley and Hawthorne are concerned with philosophical and
theological issues, I’m feeling a parallel in politics. If there’s a star in
that sordid arena, “A splendour among shadows” as Shelley labels him, as well as Shelley’s oxymoronic “bright blot,” how is that hero to proceed among the
“unheeding many”?
Politics
is a painted veil in the sense that it’s a dance of psychopaths, liars and
thieves who are concerned only with matter,
not self-examination, or transcendence, or love, kindness and compassion. What conservative
ideologues in particular care about, when you strip away the rhetoric, is
protecting their pile. I wonder if anyone noticed the way knee-jerk Republicans
went like jackals for Obama’s throat when he said, a few months ago, that none
of us get what we have entirely on our own. We all have had luck and help from
someone along the way.
That
statement is self-explanatory and valid to people of good will. However, the president
should have padded his point with more context and explanation—a rhetorical
diaper for all those infantile foot-stompers at the peak of an orgasmic
tantrum.
But humans of good will and adequate intelligence knew what he was saying.
For example, in America a white male, like me, is given extra help from his
culture the moment he emerges from the womb. No matter what his hardships have
been, they’ve been less challenging than they would have been for a woman or a
minority. Yes, that is changing, but anyone who denies that as our history, so
far, is being willfully stupid or deceitful.
Yes,
some people work a lot harder than others to achieve their pile, but no one got
his pile without luck and help from others. Anyone who denies that is undeserving
of the benefits of American democracy and capitalism.
Most
of the people crowing about creating their own pile and defending it with many
guns are Christians—you know, the religion that says the meek are blessed. It’s
the religion whose hero was a hippie born in a manger and hanged with two
thieves. Between the manger and
the cross was a lot of wandering, like Shelley’s “one,” and meditating, and
praying, and talk of turning the other cheek, and forgiveness, and care for the
poor. Christianity is anything but the religion of the rich. I was taught Jesus
showed anger only once—when the money lenders (hear, bankers) entered the temple. Oh, and there’s that business about
the camel—it’s easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle than for
a rich man to enter the kingdom of heaven. How many Christians work on Wall Street? How many are totin' steel in the NRA?
No, I mean real Christians. How many
conservatives call themselves Christian? Do you see how all that oddness adds
up to a painted veil? A theater—devoid of fact and truth?
It’s
a “miracle of rare device” that conservatives have turned the essence of
Christian self-effacement into the politics of greed, guns, and deception. It’s
a miracle of absurdity that politicians now paint the average citizen as a white guy sitting at the kitchen table, paying the bills and
feeling victimized by Commie-liberals and people of color.
An
even greater miracle is the way Democrats have permitted it, have passively
held open the door and failed to demand better behavior and consistent
logic. Extremist conservatives love the constitution and the Bible only when it
helps them hoard, pile up their pile, stuff upon stuff, and keep undesirables away from their
golf sanctuaries (their gulf clubs).
So,
yes, politics is a painted veil. Is Shelley right? It’s “Fear/And Hope, twin
Destinies” back there behind the veil--something darker and more absurd even
than the veil itself? We might do well to settle for surfaces, if the scene
behind the curtain consists of ersatz Christians stroking their guns and raiding
Grandma’s retirement funds, while Democrats, the party of godless Commie Libs, are pushing
for compassion and being ignored.
And, Percy Bysshe Shelley, when the images on the painted veil can be so gorgeous, maybe we ought to settle for what's there instead of groping for more. And more.
squawked. Closer to shore, red winged blackbirds clung to reeds and half-seriously
threatened me, I assume because of nearby nests. Two male geese squared off as if to
fight—much hissing and honking in goose profanity, I'm sure. Later, two male redwings got into the longest physical
squabble (maybe ten seconds) I’ve ever seen between two birds. At home, the
wiser gold finches, doves, cardinals, and sparrows make only symbolic gestures
of combat. 
In the ongoing American hostility and debate about evolutionism vs. creationism, what might
e.e. cummings say? And what might he say about religion in the schools? Would
he tell us to avoid teaching philosophy, science and religion altogether? 
Posts
